Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Digital Ethics Response


Aaron Swartz, who cofounded Reddit, committed suicide on January 11th, 2013.  It his highly suspected that Swartz’s prosecution for stealing articles on JSTOR contributed to his suicide.

An article by Kate Knibbs called “Was Aaron Swartz’s Data Activism Ethical?” explores this topic very carefully. From what I gather Swartz’s action was an act of civil disobedience if anything. The goal of stealing the JSTOR database for Swartz’s was to make academic journals readily available to anyone.

This case represents a basic problem among the Internet today. Who decides who gets access to what on the Internet? Through Swartz’s actions we can reach a basic answer. Anybody should have access to the resources of the Internet. JSTOR, for example is only available to small selection of people. By releasing JSTOR articles to the general public, he is allowing for a much wider range of people to take advantage of this resource.

As time begins to pass I believe Swartz’s actions will be seen in a more positive light. What Swartz has done for the Internet is massively important. BY copying articles from JSTOR, Swartz is continuing to make progress towards making resources available for the everyday person. While Swartz may be long deceased his actions will be remembered forever.

No comments:

Post a Comment